We have a real problem with taxation in this country. We don't want it. It's in our DNA. We went to war with England over it. The English felt we should contribute to their war chest, having fought to protect the colonies in the French and Indian War. England footed the bill and Parliament tried to impose the Townshend Duties to get out of debt. We said no!!!! The Crown said fine, you only have to pay tax on tea instead of numerous other commodities like paint, glass, and paper. We said no!!! They said it was only fair to pay a small amount. We said no... They said the cost of tea would actually decline! The tea tax would only threaten smugglers and Colonial middlemen. We said no tax. And a revolution was born. No taxation without representation we said.
Now the rallying cry is no taxation, period. We don't care what it is. We don't want any taxation. Grover Norquist makes a living getting Congress to sign a loyalty oath that basically says they are opposed to any tax regardless of its consequence. No matter how important or dire the situation may be... it doesn't matter. A loyalty oath must be signed.
But to who are we being loyal?
Our roads and bridges are crumbling. Everyone acknowledges that our infrastructure is in a state of total neglect. We're cutting back on fire fighters because it's too expensive. We're cutting back on police forces because it's too expensive. We're eliminating libraries because it's too expensive. We're cutting back on those who fight forest fires. We're cutting back on science programs. We're even thinking of getting rid of the U.S. Mail because it is too expensive. And that's just the short list.
The problem is you have to raise taxes or create some type of revenue to pay for these services. But, too often, creating revenue is still referred to as some form of a tax. It's a hidden tax, to their way of thinking. It could be local, state, or federal tax. We don't want it.
Picture this scene -- a young boy or girl in some small town, or a city for that matter, walks up the steps to the public library and it is closed. Closed because they cannot afford to keep it open. The wealthiest nation on the face of the earth cannot afford to keep a library open. Explain that to this young boy or girl.
The Health Care law that was upheld by the Supreme Court recently has struck fear for many in this county. "It's a tax" is the human cry. Health care is a tax! Panic! Never mind that our whole nation can now be covered by a health plan, making us the 33rd of the 33 developed nations in the world to provide universal health care. Never mind that everyone can no longer be denied an insurance policy because of a pre-existing illness... or that no one can be forced into bankruptcy because of medical debt. Never mind that sons and daughters can now be included in a family health plan for an extended period. They don't care. It's a tax! It is treason. Tyranny! Even if it is taxation with representation.
Still, it is heresy.
The English may have been right. We are an ungrateful lot.
I sure wish I was back in the States so I could have my freedoms and liberties back.
Given that the last time the tax to GDP ratio was this low was just prior to the Crash of '29, and is in fact lower than the ratio at the end of Reagan's Presidency, your feelings do not match reality.
Not sure why you would think there is "too much tax now" since (unless you're an extremely rare case) you pay less taxes now than you have at any time in the past 30 years.
Here's the full scoop: http://factcheck.org/2012/07/tax-facts-lowest-rates-in-30-years/
Look, people pay taxes, and it costs quite a bit to live (let alone comfortably), but this guy Barry must have eaten some bad ham which has negatively affected his thinking. No one minds paying his or her fair share but people pay enough. Keep taxing people and it eats considerably into their disposable income or what little they have left of it.
The real emphasis should be on government better managing the money we already pay them, not digging haphazardly into our pockets for more.
The ratio of all combined taxes to the GDP is lower today than it was when Reagan left office, making your argument weak.
The price of health care services continue to increase but the plan does not address key factors. As I understand it, there is no cap on profiteering, no negotiation of drug pricing, no establishment of a universal coding system which would allow detection and elimination of fraud and streamline services and billing etc.
The quality of our medical care has gone right down the tubes as most doctors don't even see you and instead fob you off on the Physician's Assistant or practical nurse.
Basically, the unregulated health system has for years operated like you paying the mob.
Every month you get "shook down" and have to pay for "protection" to keep the sword of Damocles off your neck.
The PPACA also pushes the move to electronic, shared medical records. There's your fraud and billing issue. All my doctors are upgrading their systems or in the process of doing so to comply.
No, it doesn't address drug pricing, but that's the deal with the devil made to get the pharmaceuticals to sit on the sidelines during the debate. This is primarily insurance reform.
CBO analysis consistently shows this bill will long haul reduce the deficit.
Health Care was granted an antitrust exemption in 1948, so not only is it a complex, it is a legal monopoly.
Taxation for their representation is what we have.
The author overstates the health care benefits. 50 million remain uninsured. Premiums can be raised beyond affordable for those with preexisting conditions. Hospitals continue to sue causing bankruptcies and foreclosures, deductibles and copayments make access to care unaffordable, and on and on.
I wish we had universal coverage, but it just ain't so.
The last thing we need is people claiming "problem solved".
FALSE!! The Pledge is about tax INCREASES. Barry, did you think you could get away with that??
From Wikipedia:
Since 1986, ATR has sponsored the "Taxpayer Protection Pledge", a written promise by legislators and candidates for office that commits them to oppose tax increases. There are separate versions at the national and state level.[3][4]
In the version for the U.S. House of Representatives, the signer pledges to:[5]
ONE, oppose any and all efforts to increase the marginal income tax rates for individuals and/or businesses; and
TWO, oppose any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates.
In the version for state legislators, the signer pledges that:[6]
I will oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes.